Expert Witness Child Abuse And Attached Issues
Law, psychology and sociology are disciplines now working together to make better systems out of courtroom testimonies. These fields are concerned with lots of cases involving professionals who are called in to stand witness in court for things specific to their field. The testimony they give is only circumstantial but it can be something an attorney builds upon for proving guilt, motive or cause.
Psychologists, legal experts, and sociologists are wondering if the testimonies of experts might not be affecting legal cases in a negative way. They need to know if things like expert witness child abuse is able to deliver relevant and meaningful things to the judicial process. Mostly, they are concerned that lawyers will not use it just for winning a case.
An expert witness is the relevant professional needed to provide clarification on court or related issues. This is one part of a hearing where medical examiners and forensics experts were called in to make people understand the specific technical details they need to know to hand down an informed and just verdict. The practice could include any kind or person with a professional degree.
Law courts will hear out professional witnesses for necessary support for judgments that will be given. The judges and jurors are made to decide whether the testimony is good enough, but counselors can subjectify it with rhetorical arguments. They can therefore make the testimony worthless.
For child abuse, there are so many fine points to any one jury process that can be used any which way by a lawyer. For the more coldblooded, wrecking reputations by implication, using expert testimony to convince jurors of guilt, and other similar methods may be the way to win a case. But the professionals who are called in to testify are calling foul.
Ethical concerns should have a solid base, something the law may require on specific points and the definitions thereof. If the current outcry for more ethical integrity for expert testimony in cases like these is heard and acted on, the definitions should have prejudicial values taken out. This will enable the experts to testify without any fear that they are being used as pawns for legal debate.
Whatever decisions are made in this regard, the fact remains that expert witnesses should not be used indiscriminately. Testifying limits the things a psychologist, say, can provide a case in terms of more objective views. In cross examinations, the attorney may ask any question that can sway jurors in one way, towards a conclusion not even supported by the professional witness, or even by proven evidence.
Today, testimonies are not untouchable or sacrosanct because many trial attorneys rely on a method of argument that will destroy testimonial value when they see it as a block to winning the case. Thus ethics should come to the fore and solve one the thorniest issues for lawyering today. The debate goes on, but there should be one question that is always kept top of mind.
It is of course the welfare of the child or children involved in a case. Psychologists can be there to see what things should or should not be mentioned in front of them. A court case can add to the trauma, and may be instrumental in making it a permanent and injurious memory that will forever change the way a child views the world.
Psychologists, legal experts, and sociologists are wondering if the testimonies of experts might not be affecting legal cases in a negative way. They need to know if things like expert witness child abuse is able to deliver relevant and meaningful things to the judicial process. Mostly, they are concerned that lawyers will not use it just for winning a case.
An expert witness is the relevant professional needed to provide clarification on court or related issues. This is one part of a hearing where medical examiners and forensics experts were called in to make people understand the specific technical details they need to know to hand down an informed and just verdict. The practice could include any kind or person with a professional degree.
Law courts will hear out professional witnesses for necessary support for judgments that will be given. The judges and jurors are made to decide whether the testimony is good enough, but counselors can subjectify it with rhetorical arguments. They can therefore make the testimony worthless.
For child abuse, there are so many fine points to any one jury process that can be used any which way by a lawyer. For the more coldblooded, wrecking reputations by implication, using expert testimony to convince jurors of guilt, and other similar methods may be the way to win a case. But the professionals who are called in to testify are calling foul.
Ethical concerns should have a solid base, something the law may require on specific points and the definitions thereof. If the current outcry for more ethical integrity for expert testimony in cases like these is heard and acted on, the definitions should have prejudicial values taken out. This will enable the experts to testify without any fear that they are being used as pawns for legal debate.
Whatever decisions are made in this regard, the fact remains that expert witnesses should not be used indiscriminately. Testifying limits the things a psychologist, say, can provide a case in terms of more objective views. In cross examinations, the attorney may ask any question that can sway jurors in one way, towards a conclusion not even supported by the professional witness, or even by proven evidence.
Today, testimonies are not untouchable or sacrosanct because many trial attorneys rely on a method of argument that will destroy testimonial value when they see it as a block to winning the case. Thus ethics should come to the fore and solve one the thorniest issues for lawyering today. The debate goes on, but there should be one question that is always kept top of mind.
It is of course the welfare of the child or children involved in a case. Psychologists can be there to see what things should or should not be mentioned in front of them. A court case can add to the trauma, and may be instrumental in making it a permanent and injurious memory that will forever change the way a child views the world.
About the Author:
When you are in need of some advice from an expert witness child abuse case, the best thing you can do is to take a look at our website. Follow the link and view the page on http://safechild.org/sherryll-kraizer-phd/witness.
You are receiving this because you signed up for it on 2013-04-11 from IP 141.0.9.129
To fine-tune your selection of which articles to receive, just login here
using your username:
To unsubscribe please use the following link:
Unsubscribe
---------------------------------
New Unique Article!
Title: Expert Witness Child Abuse And Attached Issues
Author: Linda Butler
Email: nathanwebster335@live.com
Keywords: Expert Witness Child Abuse
Word Count: 568
Category: Legal
---------------------------------
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar